Kirk Spencer, Lawrence Solomon, Victor Mor-Avi, Kathie Dean, Lynn Weinert, Martha Gulati, Aravind Herle, Alan Spiegel,
Beth Balasia, Thomas Pionke, Larry Sieb, Robert M. Lang
Chicago, Illinois
J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;13:51-7.
The advantages of digital echocardiography studies include ease of retrieval, review, comparison, duplication, and quantitation as well as the potential for moving studies over networks. However, the large amounts of data associated with digital echocardiography studies have posed new problems. Reduction of the amount of data can be accomplished with image compression, in particular MPEG-1 (Moving Pictures Expert Group), which is designed for dynamic image sequences. However the effects of different levels of compression on the quality and diagnostic content of echocardiographic images need to be established. Digital sequences of single cardiac cycles were acquired in 40 consecutive patients, MPEG-1–compressed at different effective ratios (60:1, 80:1, 120:1, 200:1, 300:1, 370:1, 500:1), reviewed, and scored for endocardial visualization. The overall visualization scores and percentages of nonvisualized segments in the compressed images were not different from the uncompressed images up to a compression ratio of 200:1. Differential effects of compression were noted on a segmental basis and also varied with baseline image quality. The ability to correctly identify regional wall motion abnormalities did not decrease until compression ratios of 1:200 or higher were used. Digital echocardiography loops, MPEG-1–compressed at an effective ratio of 200:1, demonstrate no degradation in endocardial visualization quality or diagnostic content. Compression at this ratio has the potential to reduce the storage size of digital echocardiography studies to less than 1% of their current size. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;13:51-7.)